SOLICITATION NOTICE
10 -- USMC Notice of Intent to Solicite for the Rifle Combat Optic II (RCO II)
- Notice Date
- 5/19/2005
- Notice Type
- Solicitation Notice
- Contracting Office
- M67854 Quantico, VA
- ZIP Code
- 00000
- Solicitation Number
- M6785405N1061
- Response Due
- 6/20/2005
- Archive Date
- 7/20/2005
- Description
- On behalf of the Marine Corps Systems Command (MCSC), Infantry Weapons Systems (IWS), Optics and Non-Lethal Systems (ONS) this notice announces a forthcoming procurement for the Rifle Combat Optic II (RCO II) for the M16A4 and M16A2 service rifles and the M4 carbine. The Government intends to award at least one contract for the RCO II. The Government anticipates issuing a Firm Fixed Price (FFP), Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contract (DPAS rated DO-A5) to the successful offeror or offerors representing the best value to the Government. The Government intends to award prior to 15 August 05. The provisions at FAR Part 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors ? Commercial Items apply to this acquisition. All future information relative to this procurement will be available to industry through the FedBizOpps and NECO websites. Offerors shall submit separate technical and business proposals along with (5) product (bid) samples with their proposal for the RCO II. The ! Government will evaluate proposals in accordance with FAR Part 52.212-2, Evaluation-Commercial Items. MINIMUM / MAXIMUM PURCHASES: The minimum purchase for the RCO II is 100,000 units. The maximum purchase for the RCO II is 500,000 units. This contract shall be in effect for five years from the date of award. EVALUATION: In making its final ?best value? determination, the Government will consider the following non-cost/price factors, in order of descending importance (from most to least important): (1) Technical Capability, (2) Integrated Logistics Support, and (3) Past Performance. (For the purpose of this source selection, the evaluation of ?quality? as a factor is considered to be inherent in Technical Capability and Past Performance). The factors listed above, when combined, are significantly more important than price; however, the importance of price as a factor in the final determination increases with the degree of equality in the overall technical merit of the proposals. As such, price will be evaluated, but not rated. Offerors should read the terms and conditions of this solicitation carefully and refer any questions to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO).
- Record
- SN00811395-W 20050521/050519212531 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |