Loren Data's SAM Daily™

fbodaily.com
Home Today's SAM Search Archives Numbered Notes CBD Archives Subscribe
FBO DAILY ISSUE OF MARCH 29, 2006 FBO #1584
MODIFICATION

70 -- HP Servers

Notice Date
3/27/2006
 
Notice Type
Modification
 
NAICS
334111 — Electronic Computer Manufacturing
 
Contracting Office
Defense Contract Management Agency, Defense Contract Management Agency, DCMA Procurement Center (DCMAC-W), ATTN DCMAC-W 6350 Walker Lane Suite 300, Alexandria, VA, 22310-3241
 
ZIP Code
22310-3241
 
Solicitation Number
S5105A-06-R-0005
 
Response Due
3/30/2006
 
Archive Date
4/14/2006
 
Point of Contact
Thatsanee Knight, Contract Specialist, Phone 703-428-1138, Fax 703-428-1360, - Lawrence Reed, Contract Specialist, Phone 703-428-0996, Fax 703-428-1360,
 
E-Mail Address
thatsanee.knight@dcma.mil, lawrence.reed@dcma.mil
 
Description
The purpose of this amendment is to post the remaining questions and answers: 1. Will a RFP response in .pdf be acceptable to DCMA? Ans: Yes 2. Will a secret clearance with a NAC or NACLAC investigation fulfill the ADP II requirement? Ans: Adjudicated NAC or NALC is sufficient for this effort. 3. Will DCMA provide a DD254 upon award? Ans: DD 254 is not required for this effort 4. PAST PERFORMANCE FORM: In reference to contracts that have been terminated for default: is that in reference to the set-a-side part of the contract? Ans: This requirement is for full and open competition. 5. Information to be Completed by Offerer: Is Part II to be filled in by SP or is that what the government is going to fill out when contacting the references offered? Ans: SP complete Part I; providing the info in Part I for a minimum of three (3) references, and submitted with your proposal. The Govt. will complete Part II while contact your references. 6. What is the anticipated award date? Ans: Depend on number of the proposals received; the evaluation time might take longer. 6. If DCMA responses to questions are not issued before March 25, will DCMA extend the due date for the proposal one week? Ans: No. 7. ?An offer may be rejected or not be considered for award if it is materially unbalanced. An offer is considered to be materially unbalanced when it is based on prices significantly less for some deliverables.? Question is: Was this meant for the ?set-a-side? part of the bid or is this still in effect? If this is still in effect, please give two or three examples of what is defined as being ?materially unbalanced. Ans: This effort is for full and open competition. An offer is considered to be materially unbalanced when it is based on price significantly less for some deliverables, and/or prices which are significantly higher for other similar deliverables.
 
Place of Performance
Address: Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), 6350 Walker Lane, Suite 300, Alexandria, VA
Zip Code: 22310
 
Record
SN01015165-W 20060329/060327211528 (fbodaily.com)
 
Source
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

FSG Index  |  This Issue's Index  |  Today's FBO Daily Index Page |
ECGrid: EDI VAN Interconnect ECGridOS: EDI Web Services Interconnect API Government Data Publications CBDDisk Subscribers
 Privacy Policy  Jenny in Wanderland!  © 1994-2024, Loren Data Corp.