MODIFICATION
16 -- Request for Information for the C-20/C-37 Contractor Logistics Support (CLS)
- Notice Date
- 10/19/2010
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 488190
— Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Tinker OC-ALC - (Central Contracting), 3001 Staff Drive, Ste 1AG76A, Tinker AFB, Oklahoma, 73145-3015
- ZIP Code
- 73145-3015
- Solicitation Number
- RFI-C-20_C-37-CLS
- Point of Contact
- Kim A Robinett, Phone: (405)734-1516, Della W Wyatt, Phone: 405-739-2019
- E-Mail Address
-
kim.robinett@tinker.af.mil, della.wyatt@tinker.af.mil
(kim.robinett@tinker.af.mil, della.wyatt@tinker.af.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- THIS APPLIES TO ANY VENDOR (LARGE OR SMALL) WITH CLS EXPERIENCE At the present time, the Government is conducting market research to determine the services strategy for C-20 and C-37 CLS efforts. The Government will not pay for any information received in response to this request, nor will the Government compensate any respondent for any costs incurred in developing the information provided to the Government. These questions are for market research purposes only. This is not a solicitation request. Provide your CAGE code with your answers. Please provide WRITTEN answers (NO PHONE CALLS PLEASE) to the following questions: 1. Funding for CLS efforts is limited for the next several years for the Air Force. There are several services (i.e. Army, Navy, etc.) that will use the new follow on contract for CLS services for C-20 and C-37 aircraft. Some have full funding and some have partial funding. CLS services locations are Andrews AFB, MD; Hickam AFB, HI (2 sites); Ramstein AB, GE; NAS Sigonella, IT; MacDill AFB, FL; Chievres, BE. We are expecting a FFP, FAR Part 12, IDIQ type contract for several years. Please provide your suggestions for building flexibility into the contract to help with the funding constraints. a. CLIN structure? b. Options? c. Incentives? d. Other suggestions? e. What would be the impacts of not exercising certain CLINS (i.e. USAF COMBS at Ramstein AB)? 2. Would a flying hour type CLIN for some "must pay" costs help build in flexibility? What costs should be included in flying hours? 3. If we lower the Aircraft Availability (AA) percentages would costs go down? How much? a. AA of 90% b. AA of 85% c. AA of 80% 4. If we raise the non Mission Capable Supply (NMCS) percentages would costs go down? How much? a. NMCS of 2% b. NMCS of 5 % c. NMCS of 10% 5. If we raise the Partial Mission Capable Supply (PMCS) percentages would costs go down? How much? a. PMCS of 3% b. PMCS of 5% c. PMCS of 10% 6. Does your company have at least 5 years experience in providing full CLS (Supply Chain Management, Depot Maintenance, MOB Maintenance) for the following aircraft? If not full CLS which portions have you done? a. GIII? What size fleet? How many years? b. GIV? What size fleet? How many years? c. GV? What size fleet? How many years? d. G550? What size fleet? How many years? 7. What is the optimal contract length? How are costs affected by a longer contract period of performance? Or shorter contract period of performance? What are the advantages or disadvantages of a longer contract period of performance? a. 5 years? b. 7 years? c. 10 years? 8. What is the optimal phase in period for establishing CLS for a fleet of 36 aircraft at 8 sites? What are the advantages/disadvantages of a longer phase in period? How does a longer period for phase in affect cost? a. 60 days? b. 90 days? c. 120 days? d. 180 days? 9. What portions of full CLS does it make sense to use FFP, T&M and cost reimbursable pricing?
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/OCALCCC/RFI-C-20_C-37-CLS/listing.html)
- Record
- SN02313125-W 20101021/101019233836-a46648e7e0fed1b80b6d7e2c0a549919 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |