MODIFICATION
34 -- QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
- Notice Date
- 12/18/2012
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 333517
— Machine Tool Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, AFLCMC/PKO - WPAFB, 1940 ALLBROOK DRIVE, WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB, Ohio, 45433-5309, United States
- ZIP Code
- 45433-5309
- Solicitation Number
- FA8601-13-R-0017
- Archive Date
- 1/5/2013
- Point of Contact
- Yelena Kanevsky, Phone: 9375224606
- E-Mail Address
-
yelena.kanevsky@wpafb.af.mil
(yelena.kanevsky@wpafb.af.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- 1. Laser. According to materials to be processed (especially Polyimide) it looks like you need a pico-second (ps) laser. We have a couple of different ps solutions. However, our most cost effective solution is only 1.8W (~$40k less than other option). Would 1.8W be sufficient for your application? ANSWER: At least 2.5W 2. Trepanning head. ATH-Alpha Laser Trepanning Head is mentioned. Is this a strict requirement, or can other trepanning heads be used? ANSWER: Others may be used 3. What is the required precision for the positioning stages? This spec has a large affect upon the price. ANSWER: XY stage +/- 1 um repeat accuracy at least +/- 7 um accuracy with a 1 um 4. For beam delivery only trepanning is specified. Do you need an objective? If yes, will both the objective and trepanning head be mounted on the same axis? What spot sizes are required? ANSWER: No objective, diameter resolution 0.5 microns 5. Will you need online vision- through processing objective? ANSWER: No 6. Auto alignment: Theoretically it is possible to do auto alignment through the processing objective, but due to a very small field of view it is quite complicated. Then it is rational to use a camera next to objective. As a result, at least 100 mm of X travel shall be used only for travel between camera and trepanning, another 100 mm between camera and objective. Was this assumed? ANSWER: Yes 7. In our experience, trepanning heads are designed only for 1064+532 nm wavelengths. I am almost sure that combination 355+532 in one unit is not available. If this is the case, then should we only quote a 532nm solution? ANSWER: Yes
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USAF/AFMC/88 CONS/FA8601-13-R-0017/listing.html)
- Record
- SN02951658-W 20121220/121218235023-997234138557a565783a617ad02a81fc (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |