SOURCES SOUGHT
25 -- Fender, Vehicular - Market Survey
- Notice Date
- 2/8/2016
- Notice Type
- Sources Sought
- NAICS
- 336211
— Motor Vehicle Body Manufacturing
- Contracting Office
- Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Acquisition Locations, DLA Land and Maritime, P O Box 3990, Columbus, Ohio, 43218-3990, United States
- ZIP Code
- 43218-3990
- Solicitation Number
- CM15159004
- Archive Date
- 3/2/2016
- Point of Contact
- Valerie J. Jones, Phone: 6146927866
- E-Mail Address
-
valerie.jones@dla.mil
(valerie.jones@dla.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- N/A
- Description
- Market Survey Please review the questionnaire for NSN 2510-01-498-9494 and provided any sources that may be able to manufacture these items. All information may be submitted directly to Valerie.Jones@dla.mil. This information must be provided by the response date of this synopsis. Thank you. FENDER, VEHICULAR Configuration Change Management - Engineering Change Proposal, Requestsfor Variance (Deviation or Waiver) February 2015 1. Requirements A. The Configuration Change Management section of SAE EIA-649-1 Configuration Management Requirement for Defense Contracts, Paragraph 3.3, shall be used for Configuration Control of material purchased under this contract. B. Furnished item(s) shall conform to the approved configuration requirements/revision specified, unless a Pre-Production Request for Variance (deviation) or a Post-Production Request for Variance (waiver), is processed and approved as provided by Paragraph 3. in this Standard Text Object (STO). Hereafter, the term "Request for Variance (RFV)" will also include Requests for Deviations and Waivers. 2. The definitions from EIA-649-1 apply to items being procured under this solicitation/contract, with the following clarification of Deviation & Waiver: A. Pre-Production RFV (previously known as deviation) requests permission to produce a product that does not conform to contract requirements/documentation for a limited amount of time and for specified effectivity. (A deviation differs from an engineering change in that an approved engineering change requires corresponding revision of the item's current approved configuration documentation, whereas adeviation does not.). B. Post-Production RFV (previously known as waiver) requests approval of product found during manufacture, or after having been submitted for Government inspection or acceptance, that departs from specified requirements, but nevertheless is considered suitable for use "as is" or after repair by an approved method. 3. Contractor responsibilities. A. An Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) is used to make permanent changes in the Government technical data package (TDP). Pending approval of an ECP, contractual relief should be requested in writing by the Contractor using a RFV. B. Refer to FAR Part 48 Value Engineering for cost saving improvements to the Technical Data Package (TDP). C. All ECPs submitted by the Contractor will be deemed routine. If the Contractor considers an ECP as an emergency or urgent; they shall include in their ECP submittal an explanation and all applicable supporting documentation. All ECPs will be reviewed for a determination on criticality, and, if concurred to be an emergency, the appropriate processing time-frame negotiated with the ESAs will be followed and the Contractor will be notified of anticipated response time. D. For ECPs, Specification Change Notices (SCNs) or RFV, the Contractor must submit the applicable documentation listed in sub-paragraphs D.(1) through D.(4)to the Administrative Contracting Officer(ACO), with an information copy to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO). Failure to submit a complete legible package may result in return of the ECP/RFV without processing. (1) Documentation listed in Paragraph 3.3.1 (for ECPs), 3.3.2 (RFV), 3.3.3 (for SCNs) or 3.3.4 (for Notices of Revision (NORs)) of the latest revision of EIA-649-1. (2) DD Form 1692 (current revision) for ECP. (3) DD Form 1694 (current revision) for RFV. (4) DD Form 1695 (current revision) for NOR. 4. DLA's responsibilities: A. Upon receipt of the ECP or RFV, the PCO will ensure that the applicable product specialist receives the copy from DCMA. B. Within five (5) working days from the date of receipt of the Contractor's ECP or RFV from DCMA, the PS must submit the requests and any supporting documentation via a 339 to the appropriate Engineering Support Activity (ESA), when applicable. C. Routine ECPs will be processed within 90 days from receipt by the ESA. RFVs will be evaluated and processed within 30 days from receipt by the ESA or as negotiated with the ESA. (1) The contractor will be notified in writing of approval by the return of an approved copy of the ECP or RFV. Approval will be reflected by signature of the contracting activity or a review activity specifically identified in the contract. (2) The contractor will be notified in writing of disapproval including reason(s) for disapproval. 5. For an approved RFV or an approved ECP, when the request affects the Contract, a modification will be issued to the contract incorporating the applicable requirement changes. Only a Contracting Officer is authorized to issue a modification incorporating the approved RFV and/or ECP. 6. Questions regarding the status of previously submitted ECP or RFV should be directed to the PCO. 7. The submission of an ECP or RFV by the Contractor does not affect the required delivery date of the contract. If a delivery date change is needed, it must be negotiated with the Contracting Officer and documented via modification to the contract. 8. The period of time for evaluation and approval/disapproval of an ECP and/or a RFV, as specified in Paragraph 4. C., shall not constitute excusable delay in the performance of this Contract by the Contractor or in any way relieve the contractor from compliance with the contract delivery schedule. The submission of an ECP and/or RFV by the Contractor shall not preclude the Government from exercising its rights under any clause of the Contract. (End) CLASS I OZONE DEPLETING CHEMICALS ARE NOT TO BE USED NOR INCORPORATED IN ANY ITEMS TO BE DELIVERED UNDER THIS CONTRACT.THIS PROHIBITION SUPERSEDES ALL SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS BUT DOES NOT ALLEVIATE ANY PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS. SUBSTITUTE CHEMICALS MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL UNLESS THEY ARE AUTHORIZED BY THE SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION APPLY 52.246-11 Higher Level Contract Quality Requirement (Manufacturers) FAR CLAUSE 52.246-11 APPLIES. A QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ISO 9001:2008; A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO ISO 9001:2008 (EXAMPLE SAE AS 9100), THE FOLLOWING TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008; OR A PROGRAM COMPARABLE TO THE TAILORED VERSION OF ISO 9001:2008 (EXAMPLE SAE AS 9003) IS REQUIRED. MIL-I-45208 AND MIL-Q-9858 ARE OBSOLETE AND NO LONGER CONSIDERED SUITABLE WHEN HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY IS REQUIRED. IN THE TAILORED VERSION OF THE ISO 9001:2008, ANY REFERENCES WHICH CITE THE ENTIRE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ARE INTERPRETED AS EXCLUSIONS TO THIS DOCUMENT. DLA TAILORED HIGHER LEVEL QUALITY CLAUSE FROM ISO 9001:2008 4.1 General requirements, [excluding reference to 1.2 and excluding NOTE 3 c)] 4.2.1 General, [excluding subparagraph a)] 4.2.2 Quality manual, [excluding subparagraph a)] 4.2.3 Control of documents 4.2.4 Control of records 5.1 Management commitment 5.3 Quality policy 6.2.2 Competence, training and awareness 6.4 Work environment 7.1 Planning of product realization, [excluding NOTE 2] 7.2.1 Determination of requirements related to the product 7.2.2 Review of requirements related to the product 7.2.3 Customer communication 7.3.7 Control of design and development changes 7.4.1 Purchasing process 7.4.3 Verification of purchased product 7.5.1 Control of production and service provision 7.5.3 Identification and traceability 7.5.4 Customer property 7.5.5 Preservation of product 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment 8.1 General, [excluding subparagraph b) and subparagraph c)] 8.2.2 Internal audit 8.2.4 Monitoring and measurement of product 8.3 Control of nonconforming product 8.5.2 Corrective action 8.5.3 Preventive action THIS NSN CONTAINS ONE OR MORE COMPONENTS WHICH MUST MEET QPL/QML SPECIFICATIONS.BY SUBMITTING AN OFFER, THE OFFEROR AGREES TO PROVIDE QPL/QML COMPONENTS ONLY FROM SOURCES QUALIFIED ON THE APPLICABLE QPL(S)/QML(S). "FINAL INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE ITEM SHALL BE AT THE ACTUAL MANUFACTURING FACILITY. TECHNICAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE DRAWINGS AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO VERIFY THAT THE ITEM MEETS ALL TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS. COUNT, KIND, AND CONDITION INSPECTIONS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE. THIS NOTE TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER MASTER SOLICITATION PART ONE PROVISIONS, NOTE 6, QUOTATIONS BY NON-MANUFACTURERS (APR 1984, DCSC 52.217-9C01). FINAL INSPECTION OF PACKAGING, IF REQUIRED, MAY BE CONDUCTED ELSEWHERE." IAW BASIC DRAWING NR 19207 12471730 REVISION NR G DTD 12/05/2007 PART PIECE NUMBER: IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 19207 12472301 REVISION NR A DTD 04/30/2003 PART PIECE NUMBER: IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 19207 12350824 REVISION NR P DTD 09/27/2010 PART PIECE NUMBER: IAW REFERENCE DRAWING NR 19207 12471730 REVISION NR DTD 08/08/2011 PART PIECE NUMBER:
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/DLA/J3/DSCC/CM15159004/listing.html)
- Record
- SN04013660-W 20160210/160208234825-1ca589d278bdf68c966cd16ec5351401 (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |