MODIFICATION
J -- Avian Array Line Repair - John Day Dam - Amendment 1
- Notice Date
- 11/28/2016
- Notice Type
- Modification/Amendment
- NAICS
- 237990
— Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
- Contracting Office
- Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, USACE District, Portland, Attn: CECT-NWP, PO Box 2946, Portland, Oregon, 97208-2946, United States
- ZIP Code
- 97208-2946
- Solicitation Number
- W9127N-17-R-0007
- Archive Date
- 12/29/2016
- Point of Contact
- Patrick Collins, Phone: 5038084594
- E-Mail Address
-
patrick.collins@usace.army.mil
(patrick.collins@usace.army.mil)
- Small Business Set-Aside
- Total Small Business
- Description
- Attachment F - Revised Drawing Sheet S-500 Amendment 01 The following questions about the solicitation were submitted and have been addressed below. ---An amendment (SF-30) to the solicitation is also issued and attached in response to the questions. For a proposal to be responsive, signed copies of all SF-30's must be submitted with the proposal.--- Question 1: From Drawing Sheet No. S-500, lower left corner of drawing, I believe that in the BILL OF MATERIALS, Item No. 7 is wrong as I copied from drawing to this email. As you see item no. 7 is called out as a Brostby HG-4037. I cannot find anywhere this brand name and from what I have found, I believe that it is supposed to be made by Crosby? Item 7 BROSTBY HG-4037, PN 1072494, 3/4 X 9 GALV. JAW END FITTING Answer 1: Crosby HG-4037, PN 1072494, 3/4 X 9 GALV. JAW END FITTING is the intended callout, as it references an existing item in the dampener assembly. Drawing Sheet No. S-500 has been revised and is attached to this notice. It replaced the original Drawing Sheet No. S-500 in Attachment A - Drawing Packet. Question 2: Also from the same Drawing Sheet No. S-500, upper left corner of drawing in the BILL OF MATERIALS, Item No. 5 Crosby No. MN G-414, # 1038004 SS thimble. I cannot find this in any of Crosby's literature, is this a good OR bad part number? Answer 2: Crosby No. MN G-414, # 1038004 SS thimble is available online for reference. Question 3: From Drawing Sheet No's. G-100, PLAN VIEW - FULL ARRAY and Drawing Sheet G-101 EXISTING PLAN VIEW - WASHINGTON SHORE. Both of these drawings are misleading to any viewer, because neither drawing is showing the downstream lower NAVLOCK guide wall and how the three (3) North carrier line support towers [N1, N2 and N3] relate to their positions. Also from what information that there is, I believe that they are not in a straight line. Answer 3: Drawing sheets G-100 and G-101 are intended to show the existing layout out the array. The two drawings come from the same model used in the original installation and previous rope reinstallation.
- Web Link
-
FBO.gov Permalink
(https://www.fbo.gov/spg/USA/COE/DACA57/W9127N-17-R-0007/listing.html)
- Record
- SN04336971-W 20161130/161128234059-a445c470398af3194dbb6694adc8bebd (fbodaily.com)
- Source
-
FedBizOpps Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)
| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's FBO Daily Index Page |