SAMDaily.us | SRCSGT | 23 | Next Generation Future Truck (NGFT)

SAMDAILY.US - ISSUE OF JULY 11, 2020 SAM #6799
SOURCES SOUGHT

23 -- Next Generation Future Truck (NGFT)

Notice Date: 7/9/2020 4:59:16 AM
Notice Type: Sources Sought
NAICS: 336212 — Truck Trailer Manufacturing
Contracting Office: W4GG HQ US ARMY TACOM WARREN MI 48397-5000 USA
ZIP Code: 48397-5000
Solicitation Number: W56HZV-20-R-0224
Response Due: 8/24/2020 2:00:00 PM
Archive Date: 09/08/2020
Point of Contact: Next Generation Future Truck (NGFT) Mailbox
E-Mail Address: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.dta-ngft@mail.mil
(usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.dta-ngft@mail.mil)
Description: General Information. The United States Army, referred to herein as the United States Government (USG), is seeking information to assess the marketplace availability and industry capabilities for providing the Next Generation Future Truck (NGFT) to replace the mission sets of the Palletized Load System (PLS) A1, Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck (HEMTT) A4, and M915 Tractor heavy tactical vehicles. Intent. Participation in this Request for Information (RFI) is strictly voluntary and responses shall be provided at no cost or obligation to the USG. This RFI is an important opportunity for industry to characterize its ability to support a potential future acquisition strategy for the NGFT program. This RFI, and all information herein, is for informational planning purposes only and does not constitute a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Invitation for Bid. Responses to this RFI will be used by the USG for informational and planning purposes only. Responses to this RFI are not considered to be contractual offers and cannot be accepted by the USG to form a binding contract or agreement nor will any contracts or agreements be awarded from this announcement. Information provided by the USG regarding potential contracts or agreements, as presented in this RFI, are subject to change. Additionally, this inquiry does not bind the USG to solicit for, or award, any contracts or agreements. The USG will not reimburse participants for any costs associated with responding to this RFI. Data submitted to the USG will not be returned and will remain archived as part of historical USG records. Participation in this survey, while important to USG acquisition planners, is neither mandatory nor a requisite for future participation by any contractor in this RFI or any similar RFI or RFP. Proprietary Information. The USG acknowledges its obligations under 18 U.S.C. � 1905 The Trade Secrets Act, to protect restricted information provided to the USG. Pursuant to this statute, the USG is willing to accept proprietary restrictions placed upon data presented in response to this RFI and to protect such information from unauthorized disclosure subject to the following paragraphs. Proprietary data may be submitted in writing and/or transmitted electronically and must be clearly marked �PROPRIETARY� with additional markings designating where �PROPRIETARY PORTION BEGINS� AND �PROPRIETARY PORTION ENDS�. Proprietary submissions shall be accompanied by explanatory text so the USG is clearly notified which data is proprietary and which is not proprietary. Electronic submissions shall have �PROPRIETARY� markings on both the cover sheet and the transmittal email, as well as the beginning of each file submitted. Mark as �PROPRIETARY� only data which is truly restricted information and to which there is a legal property right. Do not mark as �PROPRIETARY� data which is already in the public domain or is already in possession of the USG or third parties on an unrestricted basis. Do not mark data which is available to the USG or to the public without restriction from another source. NO CLASSIFIED DATA. DO NOT SUBMIT CLASSIFIED DATA AT ANY TIME OR INSTANCE IN RESPONSE TO THIS RFI. � Disclaimer. The USG is not responsible for the public disclosure of unmarked data received in response to this RFI. Accordingly, RFI respondents shall ensure that technical data provided in response to this RFI shall be appropriately marked, as described in paragraph 3 herein, to ensure proper USG handling of the data. Should the USG need to reproduce the protected data for distribution purposes between USG offices, all such data shall be reproduced with restrictive legends in place. The USG may use support contractors in reviewing responses. The USG will review responses that contain proprietary information without using support contractors consistent with the resources available. In cases where support contractors may be utilized for review of proprietary information, the USG will use best practices to maintain protection of the information. RFI Response. Responses to this RFI, including any supporting information, shall be submitted electronically to the email address shown below. For any submissions greater than 10 MB in size send an email notice to the point of contact below. The contract specialist will then issue a file drop-off request through the Department of Defense (DoD) Secure Access File Exchange (SAFE) (https://safe.apps.mil/). The subject line or package must read �(Company Name) Response to NGFV RFI.� Please spell out acronyms in their first instance within the email body and the body of any attached files. Electronic file formats must be compatible with Microsoft Windows 10 software. Heavy Tactical Vehicles Contracting Team CCTA-HTA-B Email: usarmy.detroit.acc.mbx.dta-ngft@mail.mil � RFI Instructions. Thoroughly read the NGFT Capability Summary and Mission Scenario sections of this RFI (Sections 8 and 9 respectively). Answer all of the questions in the Market Questionnaire provided herein. Provide yes/no and numerical responses in the column labeled �Measured Performance� and supporting rationale, comments, and recommendations in the column labeled �Capability Description/Alternative Proposal Description.� Avoid using �not applicable� to the maximum extent possible. If certain USG capabilities are deemed unavailable, or not achievable according to the respondent�s company knowledge, please provide an alternative solution(s) to achieve the USG�s desired capabilities. The respondent is encouraged to provide any additional information that enables a thorough evaluation and provides further insight into the company, product performance, reliability and warranty performance (e.g., company literature, product brochures, etc.). NGFT Capability Summary. The current fleet of heavy tactical wheeled vehicles, which includes the PLS, HEMTT, and M915 Tractor, are no longer aligned with current technology.� The USG is seeking information from vehicle manufacturers able to provide a contemporary replacement for our aging fleet leveraging the advancements available within industry. The feedback and information received in response to this RFI will inform our acquisition strategy for the next generation of heavy tactical wheeled vehicles. The USG requires the NGFT result in: Integration of advanced self-diagnostics/telematics; Drive-by-wire foundation with open architecture for future autonomy upgrades; Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (e.g., electronic stability control, collision warning, collision mitigation, adaptive cruise control, etc.); Common chassis with improved suspension; Improved fuel efficiency through smart electronic strategies such as engine off at idle and electrification of hydraulic, cooling fans, and other sub-systems; Commercial platform production to achieve economies of scale; Family of vehicles resulting in the ability to produce different variants that utilize a common power plant, transmission, cab, and navigational systems reducing the need for complex supply chains; and Potential to upgrade Force Protection measures beyond current capabilities. Mission Scenario. The NGFT will be a materiel solution designed to augment commanders� capabilities and replace current logistics support platforms through all heavy lift echelons. What separates the NGFT from previous programs is that it will be a purpose-built, multi-axle, ruggedized, fuel efficient wheeled vehicle with a dedicated payload area configured to mission requirements. The NGFT will also provide the commander flexibility to conduct both semi-autonomous and autonomous transportation operations. The purpose of modernizing the current fleet is to improve force protection, efficiency, and throughput. Integration of autonomy features will enhance force protection through iterative autonomy technology maturation, which will eventually allow for fully autonomous navigation. This capability reduces soldier vulnerability by providing an option to deliver supplies based on real time demand, independently and simultaneously, to multiple outposts via varied routes. Leveraging commercial investments in autonomy and Army technology currently in development for Leader-Follower, throughput will be increased while also providing increased manpower flexibility.� The NGFT will replace the mission sets of the PLSA1, HEMTTA4 and M915, which are described in the table below. Vehicle Mission Set PLSA1 The USG Palletized Load System (PLS) A1 is a 10x10, multi-wheel drive truck with 16.5-ton payload capability. Its mission is the rapid movement of combat-configured loads of all classes of supply, either containerized or non-containerized. The system also includes a PLS Trailer (PLST) A1, an Enhanced Container Handling Unit (E-CHU) for transporting 6.1-m (20-ft) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) containers on the PLSA1, an M3 Container Roll-in/Out Platform (CROP), Engineering Mission Modules (EMMs), M1077 and M1 flatracks, M7 Forward Repair System, M14 Improved Boat Cradle, and M15 Bridge Adapter Pallet. The PLS A1 uses an onboard Load Handling System (LHS) for loading and unloading removable flatracks. The PLS A1 can also include a Material Handling Crane (MHC). Systems with the crane are designated as M1074s; systems without a crane are M1075s. HEMTTA4 The HEMTT's primary mission is to deliver high tonnages of supplies (all classes) to combat and combat support units across all tactical mobility levels as far forward as Mission, Enemy, Troops, Terrain, and Time (METT-T) and civil considerations allow. The HEMTT also provides recovery and evacuation of equipment. The HEMTT cargo and LHS vehicles are assigned predominately to Brigade Support Battalions and Forward Support Companies. Additional vehicles are assigned to support selected corps units, including Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) units. The tanker is assigned to divisional and selected corps units worldwide. The tractor supports selected air defense, engineer, and other units requiring a high mobility prime mover. M915 The M915 Truck Tractor, Line Haul is the prime mover of semitrailers weighing up to 86,000 pounds used in the transport of cargo/container transporter and liquid petroleum/water.� The Truck Tractor, Line Haul will operate primarily in the theater area but can deliver cargo as far forward as the Division rear if the road network allows.� The Truck Tractor, Line Haul is designed to operate worldwide on primary and secondary roads.� It must have off-road capability to permit bypassing interdicted sections of the Main Supply Route (MSR) and moving from the MSR into field location container storage areas and trailer transfer points.� It is compatible with commercial and military semitrailers, Military Van (MILVAN) chassis, and commercial semitrailer chassis normally engaged in container/break-bulk cargo/petroleum/water transport operations, � Mission Equipment Package (MEP). The NGFT shall be configurable to operate in the following five configurations: � Wrecker variant: � Recover and evacuate Stryker, Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP), and other tactical wheeled vehicles up to 40-tons with only one wrecker. Accomplish roll-over recovery in 20 minutes for single vehicle on level terrain, no mire. Provide armored protection to exposed oxygen/acetylene tanks. Provide electric-based cutting capability. Cranes, winches, and related equipment shall be capable of remote operations, with connections on the vehicle driver's side. � LHS Heavy variant with crane: Transport a North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and M3 CROP demountable cargo bed (flatrack weighing two tons) with up to 16 tons of cargo payload. The vehicles shall be capable of automatic loading and unloading, and securing flat racks and containers both on the vehicle and on the M1076 Palletized Load System Trailer (PLST). The vehicle shall be capable of loading, unloading, and transporting ISO shelters/containers without the use of a flatrack. Provide on-vehicle stowage of the container interface equipment and safely negotiate a four meter overpass with an empty 8X8X20 foot container transported without flatrack. � Tractor variant: Shall be operable with the M870 equipment hauler with payloads of 40 tons, M871, M172 and M872 line haul, M967 tanker, M1062 tanker, future tanker (8,200 gallons), and commercial standard trailers. The tractor-semitrailer combination, in road march configuration, shall be able to negotiate a right angle turn posed by an intersection of two 24 foot wide roadways (wall-to-wall) in one continuous movement. � Tanker variant (2,500 gallon): Have a 2,500 gallon Threshold (T) or greater than 2,500 gallon Objective (O) fuel payload. Provide cargo fuel tank designed to self-seal from small arms puncture. � Cargo bed variant with crane: � The cargo crane variant will be capable of a minimum of 5500 pounds at 20 feet extension carrying payload of up to 22 tons (T) or greater than 22 tons (O). � Physical Characteristics:� � Vehicle Curb Weight (VCW) is defined as an empty vehicle with Basic Issue Items (BII), a three-fourths complement of fuel, lubricants, coolant, and hydraulic fluid (as applicable).� Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) will be the VCW plus payload. Payload is any load placed in or on the vehicle that increases the vehicle weight above the VCW.�� Mission Payload is defined as payload (includes crew, passengers and specified gear, cargo, armament and related hardware, basic issue items, kits, non-mission essential kits (e.g., cargo compartment heater kit, crew protection kit, winch kit, and mission essential support equipment and radios) that are not included in the curb weight. Payload includes towed load tongue weight. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) will be the VCW plus maximum designed payload. � Common Chassis. The NGFT shall have a common chassis and common powertrain to the maximum extent possible to allow for a common platform modified by the addition of MEP�s to achieve a specific variant.� Fuel Efficiency. The NGFT shall incorporate electrification technologies that allow it to reduce fuel consumption by 5% (T) to 15% (O) at GVW across the Operational Mode Summary/Mission Profile (OMS/MP) when compared to the baselined Army truck. Baseline vehicles achieve approximately two to three miles per gallon (MPG) over current OMS/MP at GVW. Additionally the NGFT shall utilize advanced idling technologies to reduce fuel consumption while vehicles are operated strictly for power generation. � Advanced Driver Assist Systems. The NGFT shall be equipped with advanced safety features that enable the following features: collision mitigation, adaptive cruise control, front and rear object detection, front and rear object avoidance, blind spot monitoring, electronic stability control, traction control, lane centering, and hill hold. Autonomy enabled. The NGFT shall be configured electronically and mechanically to accept an autonomy kit that will be able to drive and control the vehicle.� The truck shall be equipped with electronic steering, braking, throttle, and vehicle controls compliant and controllable through an Interoperability Profile (IOP) V3 compliant interface. Military Specific Modifications. Blackout Lights, Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) paint, 24V electrical, MIL-STD-814/MIL-STD-209K provisions, NATO Slave and Military Petroleum, Oils, and Lubricants (POL). Transportability Considerations. The NGFT shall be transportable within MIL-STD-1366E worldwide by air, ground, rail, and sea modes to support strategic deployment and operational maneuver In Accordance With (IAW) Joint Concept for Entry Operations dated April 2014.� Network. The NGFT will have sufficient Space, Weight, Power and Cooling (SWaP-C) to facilitate integration of basic radio and network technologies, e.g., Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio System (SINCARS), Movement Tracking System (MTS), Blue Force Tracker (BFT), etc. Power Generation. It is desired the vehicle be capable of producing 20 kW of 28 Volts Direct Current (VDC) power from the 600 VDC bus (O). Additionally, the vehicle shall be capable of importing and exporting 20 kW of power from a 600 VDC source (DC microgrid) for recharging of the energy storage system or powering vehicle high voltage or low voltage systems. Mobility. The NGFT shall be a wheeled vehicle that has excellent on and off-road mobility in cold temperatures, snow, uneven rugged terrain, soft wet ground, and mountainous terrain. At GVW, the NGFT shall be capable of climbing and descending longitudinal grades up to 60% and side slopes of up to 30%. The NGFT shall be capable of meeting the mobility requirements from VCW to GCVW on the following terrain profiles while not exceeding: � Wrecker, Tanker, Cargo, Tractor (off road variant), LHS Variant: Hard Surface (15%); Secondary Roads (25%); Cross Country (10%); and Trails (50%) with 30,000 miles anticipated annually. On road line haul Tractor Variant: 75% Primary, 25% Secondary (T) 20% Primary, 50% Secondary, 15% Trails, 15% Cross-country (O) Note: Commonality across tractor fleet (on and off road) while optimizing for the on road mission is desired. Survivability. The USG intends for the NGFT to support an armored cab that will provide protection for the crew from various blast, shock, fragment, bullet, and acceleration effects. Levels of protections should be equal to the levels described in the MRAP Capability Production Document (CPD) 1.1. The MRAP CPD 1.1 is available upon request provided the requester has clearance to receive classified data.� Crew Served Weapon. All versions of the NGFT shall be capable of accepting both the Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS) and the Objective Gunner Protection Kit (OGPK) allowing a maximum field of fire. Environmental. The NGFT shall be capable of operating in Hot/Basic/Cold as defined in Army Regulation (AR) 70-38 from 120 degrees F to -25 degrees F and -40 F with the addition of a cold weather kit from sea level through 5,000 feet altitude without cold and hot kits. The NGFT shall be a high mobility vehicle capable of operating in adverse environmental conditions as defined in MIL-STD-810 (e.g., blowing rain, blowing dust, salt fog, etc.). LHS Compatibility. The NGFT LHS variant shall be compatible with and at full payload be capable of loading, transloading to a PLST, transporting, and offloading the following: 20 foot ISO 668 standard containers operating in both 8 foot and 8.5 foot height cold climate regions) (O) Army M3 flatracks.� Additionally the NGFT LHS variant shall be capable of loading and unloading the M3 CROP flatracks into a standard ISO 668 20 foot container. The CROP is a welded steel, galvanized, steel-floored, flat cargo body with a folding front end structure assembly for stacking with front and rear blocker assemblies. A fully loaded CROP can be inserted into an ISO container directly from a PLS truck or by using a forklift. NATO Standard Agreement (STANAG) 2413 compliant flatracks such as the M1077. The M1077/M1077A1 flatrack is a welded-steel, flat cargo body with a wall used as a lifting point. The M1 flatrack is a welded steel, wooden floored, flat cargo body with folding walls for stacking. Trailer Compatibility. The NGFT Tractor variant, in addition to the characteristics listed above, shall be compatible with the following trailer features: SAE International standard gladhands Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS) standard pneumatic airbrake systems SAE 7 pin, 12V inter-vehicle connectors Military 12 pin, 24V inter-vehicle connectors Military blackout operations on the trailer if equipped Gooseneck heights from commercial standard up to tactical 64� gooseneck height Both 2� and 3.5� kingpin diameter MARKET QUESTIONNAIRE � PART 1.� BUSINESS INFORMATION: Please provide the following company information as the first section of your submission. Manufacturer Company Name (and any former names): Mailing Address:� CAGE:� �� DUNs Number: Number of Years in Business: Number of Employees:�� Number of Contract Employees: Business Type as it applies to NAICS 336212� (Check all that apply): ______ 8 (a) ______ Disable Veteran ______ Hub Zone ______ Large Business ______ Minority Owned ______ Small Business ______ Small-Disadvantaged ______ Women Owned Personnel responding to this survey Name: Title: Company Responsibility/Position: Telephone/Fax Numbers: E-mail address: PART 2. TECHNICAL QUESTIONNAIRE: Company/Manufacture�s Name: �� Company Mailing Address: �� DUNS #: �� CAGE Code: �� Company Contact Name/Title: �� Office Telephone #: �� Mobile Telephone #: �� Contact�s Office Email: �� Where applicable, the following questionnaire applies to and should be answered for all four NGFT configurations/variants as described in MEP (paragraph 9a). Item # Capability General Description Capability Detail Description Does requirement Impact Commerciality (Y/N) Measured Performance Capability Description/Alternative Proposal Description Product Overview 1 Company/Manufacturer & Subcontractors Does your company currently offer a NGFT equivalent capability for any of the configurations listed under MEP (section 9a)? Please provide the model number(s), nomenclature, and time in service. �� Physical Characteristics 2 Weight What is the current vehicle VCW of each MEP? �� 3 What is the current vehicle GVWR of each MEP? �� 4 What is your current vehicle GCWR of each MEP? 5 Do any of your current vehicle(s) meet the MEP configurations? If yes, which configurations and do you have any concerns with payload distribution based on Section III?� If no, what modifications could be made to meet the MEP configurations? �� 6 What is the maximum payload capacity (pounds) and maximum towing weight (tongue and trailer) for each MEP? �� 7 Is the center of gravity for each configuration defined? If so, please provide documentation for each MEP �� 8 Dimensions What is the overall width of the vehicle for each operational configuration/MEP? �� 9 What is the overall height of the vehicle for each operational configuration? Please note if different for each MEPs. �� 10 What is vehicle wheelbase of each MEP? �� 11 What is the ground clearance at lowest point and max vertical step of each MEP? �� 12 What is the approach angle of each MEP? �� 13 What is the departure angle of each MEP? �� 14 If available, please provide the single pass Vehicle Cone Index (VCI) with supporting data.� Does your system include a Central Tire Inflation System (CTIS)? Mobility 15 Slopes and grades What are the performance attributes for side slope and incline grades of each MEP? 16 Fording What is the maximum fording depth of each MEP? �� 17 Speed What is the maximum sustained speed on primary surfaces GVW of each MEPs, if applicable? �� 18 What is the maximum speed on primary roads surfaces at GCVW of each MEP�s, if applicable? �� 19 Turning Circle What is the curb to curb turning diameter of each MEP? (e.g., zero) �� 20 Fuel Consumption and Capacity What is the range at GVW on primary or secondary surfaces?� Please provide a fuel map if available. �� 21 Is there capability to increase the range of the vehicle? �� 22 What is the idle fuel burn rate in Gallons Per Hour (GPH) of your system? �� 23 What is the fuel capacity of each variant? 24 Major Components Please provide the following engine data: �� 25 Make: �� 26 Type: �� 27 Displacement: �� 28 Weight �� 29 JP-8/F24 Compatible?� Describe modifications made to JP-8/F24 compatibility. �� 30 Please provide an engine torque vs. RPM curve or a Horse Power vs. RPM curve.� If not available please provide the HP_ (@ 1000RPM/1500 RPM/Peak Torque Speed/2000RPM/Peak Power Speed). �� 31 Is the engine Controller Area Network (CAN) controlled? 32 Reserved �� 33 Please provide the following transmission data: Make, Model, Type, weight, type of control, speeds, weight. �� 34 Please provide the following torque converter data: Make, model, speed ratio vs. torque ratio, speed ratio vs. capacity factor. �� 35 Reserved �� 36 Reserved �� 37 What are the driveline ratios? �� 38 What are the size and type of tires used? �� Transportability 39 �Tiedowns Is the vehicle equipped with tiedown and cargo restraints?� If so, what is the maximum load (lbs.)? �� 40 Towing The NGFT must be capable of towing trailers common to the USG.� Describe any limitations your vehicle will have with towing? �� 41 What are the 5th wheel and tongue weights for the different variants? �� Safety 42 Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) What driver assist features are currently part of the truck? Collision Warning, Collision Mitigation, Rear obstacle detection, Blind Spot Monitoring, Adaptive Cruise Control 43 To what safety, ISO, or SAE standards are the ADAS features designed? 44 Does the system have electronic steering, braking, throttle, transfer case, engine control or transmission control? 45 What percentage of your ADAS component would be considered commercially available?� If there are any unique components, please elaborate. 46 What network protocol(s) are used within the ADAS and vehicle system? Unmanned 47 Autonomy Enabled Please provide an illustration or details on the electronic architecture used for the vehicle. 48 Please describe what interfaces are available to tie in an autonomy kit. 49 Describe inherent autonomous capabilities and space allocations made for integration of an autonomous kit? Please share details on the enabling technologies such as radars, cameras, by-wire functionality, and safety controllers. 50 What would need to be changed on the commercial platform to make the NGFT autonomy ready or better suited for accepting an autonomy kit? Upgradeability 51 Ability to enable advancements Describe how your platform lends itself to modularity, commonality, and future enhancements across the NGFT family of systems? 52 Describe your approach to achieve a common chassis and power train.� What major systems would be shared across variants?� 53 Commonality across the tractor fleet while optimizing for the on road mission is desired. Is it feasible to achieve the objectives of commonality for the on road tractor with relation to powertrain, chassis and suspension given the harsher off-road mission profile of the other variants? Describe any associated trades needed to achieve commonality. 54 Is the chassis capable of being expanded from a light duty 5 ton or 10 ton payload up to an 18 ton payload? If so, please elaborate on this capability with regard to the approach, chassis configuration, number of axles to include at which payload capacities an additional axle is required. 55 Is it feasible for an expandable chassis design to meet both Medium Tactical Truck and Heavy Tactical Truck requirements? 56 Are there any modifications or spiral development efforts planned for the platform? Fuel Efficiency 57 Improved fuel Efficiency Please share any enhanced technology incorporated to improve truck fuel efficiency (during standstill operation and on the move) 58 What is the current payload ton- MPG (payload tons x miles/gallon) over primary roads? 59 Is an all-electric or hybrid drive system available? 60 Would an all-electric or hybrid drive platform be recommended for any of the MEPs?� If so, which ones and what benefits would be gained in specific missions, .e.g., Return on Investment vs infrastructure cost? Survivability 61 Armor� Would an armor applique kit (i.e., B-kit) be required to meet specific armor requirements? �� 62 Does the armor solution already exist?� If so, has it been tested and to what requirement? 63 Does your armor solution include any type of special seating or seat belts? �� Environmental 64 Temperature Can your system operate at -25F to 120F without the need for special kits? Can it operate at -40F with or without a special kit? �� Electrical System 65 Power Generation In your current configuration, how much electrical power is generated at idle?� How much of this can be exported for external use? �� 66 Architecture Is your current system 24V, 12V or both? �� 67 Does the vehicle have power outlets? If known, list the connection points available and the alternating current and direct current voltage (VAC/VDC) values. �� 68 Blackout Lighting Does your vehicle have the ability to shut off all exterior and interior lighting when in run mode? �� 69 Diagnostics Is your current platform equipped with on-board diagnostics?� If yes, please describe.� If no, can this capability be added? �� 70 Can your system trend diagnostic data and predict failures? Please elaborate. Human Factors and Safety Engineering 71 Is the vehicle equipped with air conditioning?� If no, can this capability be added? �� 72 Is the vehicle capable of being operated by the 5th to 95th percentile Soldier wearing full combat gear, (to include Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment (MOLLE), individual weapons, personal body armor, and protective mask), individual Mission Oriented Protective Posture (MOPP) Level IV, and arctic clothing? Production and Sustainment 73 Reliability Planning What is your approach to reliability planning (e.g., predicting, testing, failure analysis)? �� 74 What is your estimated annual production capacity?� �� 75 Is this vehicle currently being sold commercially? If so, who are your customers? 76 What is the production and delivery lead-time upon order receipt? �� 77 NGFT � Warranty Describe any warranties that are offered for this equipment. �� Cost and Timing 78 Cost Estimates Cost and timing data is for planning purposes only and is not contractual.� The USG does not consider this information firm. Please provide cost & manufacturing lead time for the major system and subsystems including any alternate proposals presented (e.g., engine, transmission, suspension, axles, transfer case, and ADAS).� �� 79 Please describe truck upgrades needed to meet military requirements and the costs associated to incorporate and manufacture those upgrades. �� 80 What is the estimated production cost for a quantity of 1-100 trucks, 100 to 500, and 500+ trucks in each of the MEP configurations planned to be provided?� Are there any other production quantity price breaks? If so what are the quantities and price breaks associated? �� 81 Timing Plan - Estimate Please provide timing and cost estimates for delivering 5 to 10 vehicles, at least 1 of each of the different MEP military configurations. �� Trade Analysis 82 Mobility Do any of the military mobility requirements move you away from maintaining the commerciality of your truck?� If so which ones? Do any of the mobility requirements drive significant cost or complexity into the design?� Based on your system and the NGFT mobility requirements, what inherent design factors limit your vehicles ability to meet the desired military requirements?� Please describe and propose a recommended path forward that would ease this limitation.� �� 83 Environmental Are any of the environmental requirements expected to significantly alter your commercial configuration? Please describe and propose alternative requirements. �� Military Modification 84 Commercial Configuration In general, how do the other requirements outlined in Section III impact your commercial configuration?� Please describe the impact with respect to cost and performance. �� 85 Chemical Agent Resistant Coating (CARC) Paint Doe...
Web Link: SAM.gov Permalink
(https://beta.sam.gov/opp/8187455b5f504a17a60d564687982f76/view)
Record: SN05716896-F 20200711/200709230145 (samdaily.us)
Source: SAM.gov Link to This Notice
(may not be valid after Archive Date)

| FSG Index | This Issue's Index | Today's SAM Daily Index Page |

Loren Data's SAM Daily™

23 -- Next Generation Future Truck (NGFT)